Koen v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook
Plaintiff in error, hereafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted and fined for engaging’ in the Small Loan Business and exacting usury in violation of section 1, chapter 153, Acts of 1925. He appealed and assigned errors. All of the assignments, save one, challenge the constitutionality of the Act. Through the other assignment of error it is insisted that the Act applies only to persons engaged in the business of lending money on assignments of wages and salaries and does not extend to defendant’s business of lending money on the personal obligation of the borrower.
Defendant kept an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Brown-Forman Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Henley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- Scott v. Nashville Bridge Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Pacific Eastern Corp. v. Gulf Life Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- In Re FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Kelleher v. MinshullWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Strickler v. State Auto Finance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Cumberland Capital Corp. v. PattyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.