Legal Opinion
Rigel Corp. v. Cutchall
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 1994No. S-92-336PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.
I. STATEMENT OF CASE
Pursuant to the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 21-2080 (Reissue 1991), the plaintiff-appellee, Rigel Corporation, instituted this action seeking a determination of the fair value, including interest, of the shares of common stock held by the defendant-appellant, Gregory S. Cutchall, in Rigel/Chix, Inc., a corporation which was merged into Rigel. The trial court determined the fair value of such shares to be $24,640 plus interest and gave Rigel credit for the $20,000 and $132.33 in interest it had previously paid Cutchall. Cutchall appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Cavalier Oil Corp. v. HarnettSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Voeller v. Neilston Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Blake v. Blake Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In Re Valuation of Common Stock of McLoon Oil Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Jantzen v. Diller Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Pueblo Bancorporation v. Lindoe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- HMO-W INC. v. SSM Health Care SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Friedman v. Beway Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. NullNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.