Legal Opinion
Wynn v. Earin
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 22, 2005No. 22811-8-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
125 P.3d 236 (2005)
131 Wash.App. 28
Pardner WYNN, Appellant,
v.
Jolene EARIN and John Doe Earin, as Husband and Wife and Their Marital Community, Respondents.
No. 22811-8-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.
December 22, 2005.
Mary E. Schultz, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.
James B. King, Christopher J. Kerley, Attorneys at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondents.
SWEENEY, A.C.J.
¶ 1 Washington's Health Care Information Act prohibits disclosure of health care information without specific procedural safeguards, which include the consent of the patient. Chapter 70.02 RCW. But an…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Boeing Company v. Sierracin CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Restaurant Development, Inc. v. Cananwill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Watson v. Department of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Watson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Wynn v. EarinWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Wynn v. EarinWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Segura v. CabreraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014