Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Watson v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 11, 2006No. 33421-6-IIPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 The Department of Labor and Industries (Department) appeals a superior court order requiring it to recalculate Robert Watson’s monthly wages for time loss compensation under RCW 51.08.178(1). The Department had initially classified Watson as an essentially intermittent employee and calculated his wages according to RCW 51.08.178(2). We hold that there was substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings that, although Watson’s work history revealed he had only worked seasonally at the Port Ludlow Golf Course, Watson intended to work full time and therefore could not be classified…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Ruse v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Morse v. AntonellisWashington Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Rogers v. Dept. of Labor & Indus.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Watson v. Department of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. City of Bellevue v. RaumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. Malang v. DEPARTMENT OF L&ICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API