Legal Opinion
United Nuclear Corp. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 3, 1969No. Civ. A. 68-1395PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FULLAM, District Judge.
This is a private antitrust action under 15 U.S.C. § 26, arising out of the sale of 21% of the stock of United Nuclear Corp., the plaintiff, by the Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. to the defendant, Combustion Engineering, Inc. On July 1,1968, plaintiff filed its complaint alleging that this acquisition violated section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and sections 7 and 8 of the Clayton Act, 15 U. S.C. §§ 18, 19.
On July 1, 1968, after hearing, I entered a temporary restraining order which prevented Combustion Engineering from exercising its rights as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Continental Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Federal Trade Commission v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals, Incorporated v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Du Pont Holdings, Inc., and Conoco IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- In Re Uranium Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Federal Trade Commission v. Atlantic Richfield Company and the Anaconda CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Hammermill Paper Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- United States v. Blue Bell, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.