Legal Opinion
In Re Uranium Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 30, 1979No. MDL 342, No. 76 C 3830PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
473 F.Supp. 393 (1979)
In re URANIUM ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff,
v.
RIO ALGOM LIMITED, Rio Algom Corporation, Rio Tinto Zinc Corporation Limited, RTZ Services Limited, Rio Tinto Zinc Corporation, Conzinc Rio Tinto of Australia Limited, Mary Kathleen Uranium Limited, Pancontinental Mining Limited, Queensland Mines Limited, Nuclear Fuels Corporation, Anglo-American Corporation of South Africa, Limited, Engelhard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation, Denison Mines, Limited, Denison Mines (U.S.) Incorporated, Noranda Mines Limited, Gulf Oil Corporation, Gulf…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Loew's Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Paul Smith, an Individual v. Edward L. Montoro and Film Ventures International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- In Re Industrial Gas Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Bowmar Instrument Corp. v. Continental Microsystems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. Re/Max South CountyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1994
- Consolidated Terminal Systems, Inc. v. ITT World Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.