Legal Opinion

United States v. Hayes

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided January 11, 1989No. 2:88-cr-00136PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ACKER, District Judge.

This judge has never written an opinion using the personal pronoun. I have always used the traditionally formal and somewhat stilted language, “this court,” to describe myself. This case, however, peculiarly lends itself to a deviation from this norm. The personal pronoun will therefore be used hereinafter in order to avoid any possible implication that what I am saying represents the thinking of the entire bench of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Some of its judges may agree. Others may not.

In the above-entitled…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. WattsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  2. Brooks v. Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Caplan v. BenatorCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  4. Kevin Sharp Enterprises, Inc. v. State ex rel. TysonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API