Legal Opinion

United States v. Watts

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 5, 2011No. 3:09-cr-30030PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION REGARDING APPLICATION OF THE FAIR SENTENCING ACT OF 2010 (Dkt. No. 69) 1

PONSOR, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The narrow question raised by this pretrial motion is whether, if Antoine Watts is convicted of possessing with intent to distribute five grams or more of crack cocaine, the court will be compelled to impose a minimum mandatory sentence of at least five years on him, or will have the discretion to impose a lower sentence as permitted by the recently enacted Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (“FSA”). Pub. L. No. 111-220,124 Stat. 2372 (2010).

The broader…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. DouglasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. ShullDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
  4. United States v. BlandonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. United States v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API