Caplan v. Benator
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Per curiam
Griffin Sikes, Jr., an attorney, challenges a February 10, 2016, order of the Montgomery Circuit Court (“the trial court”) that ordered him to pay $3,000 as a sanction for vexatious discovery practices.
The record1 indicates that Sikes represented Rosalyn M. Caplan in a tort action in the trial court in which Caplan sought an award of damages from Patty S. Benator (“Benator”), Gene A. Benator, Linda S. Fleet (“Fleet”), and Stuart L, Fleet; later, a probate-court action involving the estate of Edgar K. Simon, Jr., was removed to the trial court and consolidated with the tort action. Caplan and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Albert Flaksa v. Little River Marine Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norvell v. NorvellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
- Norvell v. NorvellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
- C.L.L.M. v. A.D.L.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018