Legal Opinion

Caplan v. Benator

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 26, 2016No. 2150469PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Griffin Sikes, Jr., an attorney, challenges a February 10, 2016, order of the Montgomery Circuit Court (“the trial court”) that ordered him to pay $3,000 as a sanction for vexatious discovery practices.

The record1 indicates that Sikes represented Rosalyn M. Caplan in a tort action in the trial court in which Caplan sought an award of damages from Patty S. Benator (“Benator”), Gene A. Benator, Linda S. Fleet (“Fleet”), and Stuart L, Fleet; later, a probate-court action involving the estate of Edgar K. Simon, Jr., was removed to the trial court and consolidated with the tort action. Caplan and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Albert Flaksa v. Little River Marine Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Norvell v. NorvellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  2. Norvell v. NorvellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  3. C.L.L.M. v. A.D.L.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API