Legal Opinion

Hebo v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 7, 1950No. C. D. 1270PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

Plaintiff, whose business is the preparation of glandular and hormone products for pharmaceutical purposes, im*94ported a substance consisting of processed suprarenal glands. The collector classified tibe merchandise as a medicinal preparation of animal origin, under paragraph 5 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the trade agreement with Argentina, 77 Treas. Dec. 138, T. D. 50504, and accordingly assessed duty at 12% per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff claims that the commodity is a drug, either advanced in condition, dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem, under paragraph 34 of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. G. D. Searle & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson Hayward Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. Hebo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API