Legal Opinion

Chemical Specialties Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 5, 1955No. C. D. 1698PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise in this case consists of a substance known as 21-acetoxy pregnenolone, a steroid, which was classified under paragraph 5 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as a medicinal preparation and assessed with duty at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem. It is claimed properly dutiable at the rate of 5 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 34 of the act, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, as a drug, advanced, either directly or by virtue of the similitude provision of paragraph 1559 of the tariff act. Reference to the pertinent provisions of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. G. D. Searle & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Synthetic Patents Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  5. United States v. Davies, Turner & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Organon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Organon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Sandoz, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API