Chemical Specialties Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, Judge:
The merchandise in this case consists of a substance known as 21-acetoxy pregnenolone, a steroid, which was classified under paragraph 5 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as a medicinal preparation and assessed with duty at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem. It is claimed properly dutiable at the rate of 5 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 34 of the act, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, as a drug, advanced, either directly or by virtue of the similitude provision of paragraph 1559 of the tariff act. Reference to the pertinent provisions of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- G. D. Searle & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
- Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Synthetic Patents Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
- United States v. Davies, Turner & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Organon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Organon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Sandoz, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968