State v. Howard
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Lonnie A. Howard appeals the district court order denying his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to delivery of methamphetamine. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Howard’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On two occasions, a confidential police informant bought tablets believed to be ecstasy, but were actually methamphetamine, from Kayla Bruning. On both occasions, Howard drove Bruning to pick up the tablets from a supplier and drove her to the site where the informant bought the tablets. The informant entered Howard’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Patten v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Eaton v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Eaton v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. FICKERTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hale v. State of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Dodge v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. GressNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Kuntz v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. WatsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021