Legal Opinion

Eaton v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2011No. 20100235PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Clifford Scott Eaton appealed from a district court judgment summarily denying his application for post-conviction relief. We affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief, concluding there was a sufficient factual basis to support Eaton’s guilty plea for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver.

I

[¶ 2] Eaton pleaded guilty to two charges on August 3, 2004 — possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia. The State offered a factual basis to support the guilty pleas, which included a list of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Syvertson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BlurtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. BatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. AtkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Mackey v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. GressNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Dodge v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Interest of A.L.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API