State v. FICKERT
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Jake Fickert, Jr. appeals from a criminal judgment entered after he plead guilty to gross sexual imposition. We hold Fickert failed to establish the district court committed obvious error, and the district court correctly determined a sufficient factual basis existed to support Fickert’s guilty plea. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In July 2008, Fickert was charged with gross sexual imposition in Williams County. On February 18, 2009, the district court held a hearing to allow Fickert to change his plea from not guilty to guilty. Both the Williams County state’s attorney and Fickert’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. SmudaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. KruckenbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. CauserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CarpenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Eaton v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. HoehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. FrederickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. HowardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.