Legal Opinion

State v. FICKERT

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2010No. 20090224PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jake Fickert, Jr. appeals from a criminal judgment entered after he plead guilty to gross sexual imposition. We hold Fickert failed to establish the district court committed obvious error, and the district court correctly determined a sufficient factual basis existed to support Fickert’s guilty plea. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In July 2008, Fickert was charged with gross sexual imposition in Williams County. On February 18, 2009, the district court held a hearing to allow Fickert to change his plea from not guilty to guilty. Both the Williams County state’s attorney and Fickert’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. State v. SmudaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. KruckenbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. BatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. CauserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CarpenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Eaton v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. HoehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. FrederickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. State v. HowardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API