Hale v. State of North Dakota
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Manmohan Garg appeals a district court order denying his motion to withdraw guilty pleas in two criminal cases. Garg argues the district court erred by denying the motion because his attorneys were constitutionally ineffective for failing to advise him of the deportation consequences of the plea agreements as required by the United States Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010). We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Garg is a non-citizen living in the United States. In April 2011, Garg received notice from United States Immigration…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bahtiraj v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. White BirdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Morris v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Yoney v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. GargNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.