State v. Reese
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROEB, Judge.
Appellant James DeForrest Reese questions whether the trial court abused its discretion by ordering as a condition of probation that he pay restitution for charges dismissed or never brought by the State.
Appellant pleaded guilty to first degree burglary of a law office in Maricopa County Superior Court Cause No. CR-103907. Pursuant to the plea agreement, the State dismissed Maricopa County Superior Court Cause No. CR — 100465, which included four counts of burglary and grand theft. The trial court found appellant guilty of first degree burglary of the law office and placed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Shenah v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Redewill v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- State v. PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. FancherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- State v. PearceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- State v. O'DONNELLSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.