State v. Albert
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBbown, J.
There is no contention here that the property is other than personalty in character. The indictment charges a single offense, and the case was tried upon the theory that the taking of the several pieces of personal property described therein constituted but one offense. This theory will be followed here. That the taking of the property constitutes a single larceny if committed pursuant to a single impulse and in execution of a general felonious scheme, see 2 Wharton’s Criminal Law (11 ed.), § 1169; 1 McClain on Criminal Law, 584; 36 C. J., Larceny, §§ 218, 219; 7 L. R. A. (N. S.), 520, 523,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Multnomah County v. Willamette Towing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Laam v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- State v. HintonOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. MeldrumOregon Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- State v. CallaghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. CraceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Eaton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- State v. WaterhouseOregon Supreme Court · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.