Legal Opinion

State v. Waterhouse

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 2016No. CC D121196M; CA A153037; SC S062799PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

Defendant took a pickup truckload of scrap metal items from the metal recycling bin of a Washington County microchip manufacturing plant and was subsequently charged with third-degree theft, a criminal charge applicable when the value of the item or items stolen is less than $100. See ORS 164.043 (so stating). At the close of the state’s case-in-chief, defendant unsuccessfully moved for a judgment of acquittal, arguing that the evidence presented by the state had failed to establish that the items he had taken possessed actual—as opposed to speculative—value. Defendant was subsequently…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. RaderOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. BroomOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State v. AlbertOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State v. WhitleyOregon Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. CazeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. McClourCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API