Legal Opinion

State v. Meldrum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Baker: Rorert Eakin, Judge. Alexander Meldrum appeals from a conviction of larceny.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

The defendant and one Manny Howard were jointly charged by an information filed by the district attorney of the Eighth Judicial District with the crime of larceny by stealing a mare, the property of R. R. Palmer and H. E. Denham. The defendants severed on their trial. Meldrum was convicted, and appeals. The evidence against him tended to show that in the spring of 1901 he and Howard, assisted by two or three others, were engaged in gathering horses from the range a few miles from Baker City for shipment. Palmer, one of the owners of the mare alleged to have been stolen, passed them on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PomeroyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Boyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1888
  3. State v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Stokely v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
  5. Hill v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. EgglestonOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  2. State v. AlbertOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Smith v. National Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State v. HintonOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. TellerOregon Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API