Legal Opinion
Devonshire Development Associates v. City of Hackensack
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided March 30, 1981PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVERS, J. T. C.
Devonshire Development Associates (taxpayer) brings this motion for summary judgment which concerns the effect of N.J.S.A. 54:2-40.4 and N.J.S.A. 54:3-22(c) to (f) (hereinafter referred to collectively as chapter 123) on the limitation imposed by the jurisdiction of the county tax boards and the Tax Court, by Matawan v. Tree Haven Apartments, Inc., 108 N.J.Super. 111 (App.Div.1969). The facts follow.
*374Taxpayer filed a complaint in the Tax Court alleging that the Bergen County Tax Board (board) did not have the authority to increase the original assessments on a group of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- In Re the Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Samuel Hird & Sons, Inc. v. City of GarfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Rek Investment Co. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Reinauer Realty Corp. v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Tri-Terminal Corp. v. Borough of EdgewaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Murnick v. City of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Borough of ClosterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Terrace View Gardens v. Township of DoverNew Jersey Tax Court · 1982
- FMC Stores Co. v. Boro. of Morris PlainsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.