Legal Opinion
Rek Investment Co. v. City of Newark
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 17, 1963PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
80 N.J. Super. 552 (1963)
194 A.2d 368
REK INVESTMENT COMPANY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
THE CITY OF NEWARK, RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 9, 1963.
Decided October 17, 1963.
Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and LABRECQUE.
Mr. Jack Okin argued the cause for petitioner-appellant (Messrs. Okin and Okin, attorneys).
Mr. Saul A. Wolfe argued the cause for respondent City of Newark (Mr. Norman N. Schiff, Corporation Counsel of the City of Newark, attorney).
Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, for respondent Division of Tax Appeals, filed a statement…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In Re the Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Hackensack Water Co. v. Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Switz v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Riverview Gardens, Section One, Inc. v. Borough of North ArlingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- City of Newark v. West Milford Tp., Passaic CountySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Pantasote Co. v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Glen Wall Associates v. Township of WallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Samuel Hird & Sons, Inc. v. City of GarfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- GLENPOINTE ASS'N. v. Tp. of TeaneckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.