Legal Opinion
Sterman v. Ziem
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 1936No. Civ. 5641PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
This is an action for damages for an alleged conspiracy to defraud respondent Sterman of his interests in a certain partnership.
In 1930, Jack Sterman and Roy IT. Ziem formed a partnership known as Ziem-Sterman Upholstering Co., and continued as such copartners until September, 1933. At that time the partners made a voluntary assignment of their business and assets to M. J. Flavin, for the benefit of their creditors, which assignment was in the usual form and provided that after the payment of their partnership debts and liabilities, the surplus, if any, should be paid to the partners. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Moropoulos v. C. H. & O. B. Fuller Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Stenian v. TashjianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Niroad v. FarnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Garn v. ThorwaldsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Eggleston v. . EgglestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Teater v. Good Hope Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Laughlin v. HaberfeldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Lyon v. MacQuarrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Perlick v. Pacific Discount Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.