Legal Opinion

Niroad v. Farnell

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1909No. Civ. No. 575PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. Thos. C. Denny, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

This is an action in claim and delivery to obtain the possession of a certain gasoline boat used for conveying passengers on Russian river between Russian River Landing and Monte Rio, in Sonoma county, and the complaint is in the usual form. The answer denies the ownership of plaintiff or his right to the possession of the property, and alleges ownership in defendant Parnell, and sets up as a separate defense that said defendant has a lien upon the property by virtue of services performed and materials furnished for said launch with the knowledge and consent of plaintiff. There is also an…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. American Milling & Industrial Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Eggleston v. . EgglestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Swanson v. SiemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Laughlin v. HaberfeldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Andrews v. BushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API