Legal Opinion
Bartholomew v. Insurance Co. of North America
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided November 4, 1980No. Civ. A. 76-0343PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PETTINE, Chief Judge.
This is a diversity action brought by plaintiffs, residents of Massachusetts and Connecticut, against four insurance companies, none of which are incorporated in or have their principal place of business in either of these two states. 1 The question presented is which of the defendant insurers (if any) L liable for a $300,000 judgment obtained by the plaintiffs against New England Robo-Wash, Inc. and Robo-Wash Inc. The latter are two related corporations, one or both of which were insured by each of the defendant companies at some point during the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Gruol Construction Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- APPALACHIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Gilbane Building Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- D'Auria v. Zurich InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- George Bartholomew v. Appalachian Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.