Legal Opinion
George Bartholomew v. Appalachian Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 28, 1981No. 81-1028PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge.
Robo Wash, Inc., and New England Robo Wash, Inc., the manufacturer and distributor, respectively, collectively hereinafter Robo, supplied certain professional car wash equipment, known as a Spyder unit, to plaintiffs, Bartholomew and another, in 1972. On plaintiffs’ facility opening for business it immediately began to suffer difficulties. Parts broke down regularly and proved difficult or impossible to replace, leaving the equipment inoperable for substantial periods of time. Even worse, under the guise of cleaning customers’ cars, the Spyder sometimes sprayed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hooper v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Bartholomew v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1980
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. American InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Summers v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Export SS Corporation v. American Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- APPALACHIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. The Stroh Companies, Inc. And the Stroh Brewery CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Gilbane Building Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.