Legal Opinion
Meranus v. Lawyers' and Homemakers', C., Assn.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided July 30, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The facts appearing from the bill of complaint, admitted on this motion, are that in October, 1932, a final decree was entered in a foreclosure suit wherein the defendant in this suit was the complainant and the complainant in this suit, and others, were defendants, by which it was adjudged that there was due to the complainant therein the sum of $8,543.81 on its bond and mortgage and directing a sale of the mortgaged premises; that at such sale on January 3d 1933, the mortgagee-complainant purchased the premises for $100; that on the day of said sale there were no bidders other than the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Federal Title, C., Guaranty Co. v. LowensteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Better Plan B. L. Assn. v. HoldenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Cameron v. Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Lurie v. J. J. Hockenjos Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Lurie v. J.J. Hockenjos Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
3Cited by6 opinions
- Young v. WeberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. PetchenskyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Falcon B. L. Assn. v. SchwartzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Fidelity Union Tr. v. Multiple RealtyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Meranus v. Lawyers', C., B. L. Assn.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.