Legal Opinion

Meranus v. Lawyers', C., B. L. Assn.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 13, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Subsequent to the filing of this court's opinion in the above cause (116 N.J. Eq. 402) defendant applied for reargument of its motion to strike the bill. Pending disposition thereofBroadman v. Colonial Building and Loan Association, 118 N.J. Eq. 275, was decided by the court of errors and appeals. That decision prompted defendant to renew its motion to strike.

The original opinion of this court referred to the bill of complaint as one in the nature of a bill of review. Under theBroadman Case, it is apparent that the court of errors and appeals will under no circumstances permit the award of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Broadman v. Colonial Building-Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Meranus v. Lawyers' and Homemakers', C., Assn.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 79-83 Thirteenth Ave., Ltd. v. DeMarcoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  2. Vigue v. ChapmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1941
  3. Fidelity Union Tr. v. Multiple RealtyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API