Lurie v. J. J. Hockenjos Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Tkenchakd, J.
In general the situation dealt with by the court below is correctly stated in its opinion, so far as essentials are concerned, and we think the case was rightly decided.
We might well affirm the order for the reasons given in the opinion of the court below. But some questions which may not have been stressed in the court below are now strenuously argued, and those we will now consider.
The complainant’s bill averred that the deficiency arising out of the foreclosure of the mortgage given by the complainant to the defendant was due to…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Young v. WeberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. PetchenskyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Meranus v. Lawyers' and Homemakers', C., Assn.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Fidelity Union Tr. v. Multiple RealtyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- J. J. Hockenjos Co. v. LurieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.