Legal Opinion

Better Plan B. L. Assn. v. Holden

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 5, 1933PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainant, by its bill, seeks to recover a decree against defendants for the amount of deficiency remaining unpaid in respect of three bonds after foreclosure and sale of the mortgaged premises comprised in the mortgages given to secure the bonds. The suit is against the defendant Holden, who was the original obligor and mortgagor, and the defendant Feinberg, subsequent grantee of the mortgaged premises, who assumed payment of the mortgage debt.

The bill alleges the execution and delivery of the bonds and mortgages, the conveyance by the mortgagor Holden to Feinberg and the assumption of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federal Title, C., Guaranty Co. v. LowensteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. Fifth Ave. Bank of N.Y. v. CompsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  3. Minzesheimer v. DoolittleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  4. Snyder v. BlairNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1880
  5. Murray v. PearceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Young v. WeberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Union Joint Stock Land Bank of Louisville v. Knox CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  3. Drannek Realty Co. v. Nathan Frank, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Richmond Mortgage & Loan Corp. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. 79-83 Thirteenth Ave., Ltd. v. DeMarcoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API