Legal Opinion

Lurie v. J.J. Hockenjos Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 28, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill seeks to restrain the defendant from the prosecution of an action at law for a deficiency arising out of a foreclosure sale and a decree setting aside the sheriff's sale of the mortgaged premises and the confirmation thereof by this court, on four separate grounds, as follows: (1) an alleged agreement prior to the foreclosure sale between defendant and complainant for release from liability for deficiency if complainant refrained from bidding at the sale; (2) because of an announcement that the sale would be "subject to all municipal liens, if any, against the said premises and to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Federal Title, C., Guaranty Co. v. LowensteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. PetchenskyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  2. Woolley v. TougasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1938
  3. Meranus v. Lawyers' and Homemakers', C., Assn.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  4. Fidelity Union Tr. v. Multiple RealtyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  5. J. J. Hockenjos Co. v. LurieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API