Legal Opinion

State v. A.C.M.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2009No. 20070849PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

{1 Arturo Nuosci appeals the juvenile court's order terminating his parental rights over A.C.M. We affirm.

FACTS

12 ACM., a minor child, has lived with Matt and Toni Worthington since October 2004, when he was three months old. He began living with the Worthingtons after his biological father, Mr. Nuogei, was arrested by federal agents on numerous charges. Upon Mr. Nuose!'s arrest, A.C.M.'s biological mother, Rachel Sullivan, took custody of A.C.M., even though she had previously relinquished her parental rights pursuant to a surrogacy agreement with Mr. Nuoseci.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. B.R.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State in Interest of MLCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. J.D.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  2. R.E. v. B.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. A.A. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  4. H.K. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  5. In Interest Of B.T.B.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2018

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API