In Interest Of B.T.B.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Judge:
¶ 1 V.T.B. (Father) appeals the juvenile court's order terminating his parental rights to his children, B.T.B. and B.Z.B. He contends that termination was not "strictly necessary" in this case, for various reasons. Father's arguments compel us to directly analyze the meaning of the phrase "strictly necessary," as used in Utah Code section 78A-6-507(1), and require us to examine how that relatively new statutory admonition fits with the historical two-part test we have long applied in termination of parental rights cases.
¶ 2 In order to comprehensively answer these questions, we…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State Ex Rel. B.R.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
- Eldridge v. JohndrowUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- T.L.W. v. Office of the Guardian Ad LitemCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- In re J. P.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Garcia-LorenzoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
- In re A.H...Court of Appeals of Utah · 2022
- In re J.J.W.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2022
- In re N.K.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- In re A.R...Court of Appeals of Utah · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.