Legal Opinion
In the Interest of Doe
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1994No. 17297PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOON, Chief Justice.
Appellant, the natural mother (Mother) of Jane Doe (Doe), appeals from the family court’s order denying her motion for reconsideration of the family court’s determination of exclusive jurisdiction over Doe and award of foster custody of Doe to appellee Department of Human Services (DHS). On appeal, Mother contends that the family court erred in finding jurisdiction and awarding foster custody despite (1) a DHS social worker’s unavailability for cross examination at trial and (2) the submission of supplemental DHS investigative reports without amending the original petition…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Kaho'ohanohano ex rel. Morales-Kaho'ohanohano v. Department of Human ServicesHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Meindl v. Genesys Pacific Technologies, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Doe v. DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.