Legal Opinion

Leak v. . Armfield

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 23, 1924PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

Tbe sole question presented is, Did tbe court below commit error in restraining tbe sale?

In Lea v. Johnson, 31 N. C., 19, Pearson, J., said: “ ‘Hard cases are tbe quicksands of tbe law.’ In other words, a judge sometimes looks so mucb at tbe apparent hardship of tbe case as to overlook tbe law.”

In Cureton v. Moore, 55 N. C., 207, it was said: “A court of equity ean no more relieve against ‘bard cases/ unless there be some ground of equity jurisdiction, than a court of law, for both courts act upon general principles. Equity, as well -as law, is a science, and does not depend upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lea v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1848
  2. Smith v. ConnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Pritchard v. . SandersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Brothers v. . HarrillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1855

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brown v. . SheetsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Teeter v. . TeeterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Dennis v. RedmondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Holder v. Home Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API