Legal Opinion

Pritchard v. . Sanderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

MotioN by defendant to vacate an injunction heard at Chambers on the < 17th day of September, 1880, before Schenclc, J. The motion was made in an action pending in Pasquotank superior*court in which an injunction had been granted on the first day of May, 1880. The facts are as follows: At a sale made by George W. Charles, administrator of Daniel Richardson, under a license of the proper court therefor on the 6th of July, 1867, the feme plaintiff purchased a tract of land…

Read the full summary

MotioN by defendant to vacate an injunction heard at Chambers on the < 17th day of September, 1880, before Schenclc, J. The motion was made in an action pending in Pasquotank superior*court in which an injunction had been granted on the first day of May, 1880. The facts are as follows: At a sale made by George W. Charles, administrator of Daniel Richardson, under a license of the proper court therefor on the 6th of July, 1867, the feme plaintiff purchased a tract of land belonging to the intestate and known as the.“Richardson farm” for $3,627, and the title was retained as a security for the…

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

It is unnecessary to consider in. detail the allegations and denials reciprocally made in determining the point arising on the appeal. Nor can we receive as evidence the unsworn answers put in by the other defendants. On hearing the motion, His Honor ruled that if the plaintiffs within a limited period paid into the office the sum admitted to be due with interest from January 1st, 1880, the injunction should be continued to the final hearing, and if they failed, it should stand dissolved, and the trustee should proceed to sell the lands. From this order the defendants appeal.

It is conceded in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Capehart v. . BiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  2. Kornegay v. . SpicerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  3. Purnell v. . VaughanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Leak v. . ArmfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Hutaff v. . AdrianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  3. Whitehead v. . HaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Gooch v. . Vaughan BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Howell v. . PoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API