St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Foster
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaekson, J.
The defendant’s first question involved is as follows: “Is the whole of a boundary of land, containing five hundred acres, subject to restrictions previously imposed upon a small portion thereof, containing approximately thirteen acres, by reason of the fact that the five-hundred-aere boundary is conveyed ‘subject to all the conditions, restrictions, and stipulations’ contained in the agreement creating the restrictions upon the thirteen-acre tract?” We think not.
The language in the agreed statement of facts as to certain of the restrictions in the deed is as follows : “Subject, however, to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Leak v. . ArmfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cummings v. Dosam, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- DIXIELAND REALTY COMPANY v. WysorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Foreclosure of a Lien by Ridgeloch Homeowners Ass'n v. McNeillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Henkel v. Triangle Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Home Realty Co. & Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Red Fox Country Club Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.