Legal Opinion

Dennis v. Redmond

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The only exception and assignment of error made by plaintiff is “to the foregoing judgment.” A case where the facts are similar in all respects to the present one is that of Ingram v. Mortgage Co., 208 N. C., 329. At page 330, it is said: “The first exception is to the judgment itself. This judgment is regular upon its face, and the facts found by the trial judge are sufficient to support the decree. Consequently, the first exception must fail. Warren v. Bottling Co., 207 N. C., 313; Moreland v. Wamboldt, ante, 35. The second exception is 'to the finding and signing of the order of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grantham v. . NunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. S. B. Parker Co. v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Parlier v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Wilson v. Union Trust Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Leak v. . ArmfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rosser v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Alexander v. GallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Smith v. Land & Mineral Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Buchanan v. Carolina Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Carroll v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API