Teeter v. . Teeter
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogdbN, J.
Do tbe pleadings and affidavits disclose a serious dispute between tbe parties?
The plaintiff alleged that be bad leased tbe defendant’s half interest in tbe dwelling-house for tbe year 1933 for a stipulated monthly rental, and in consideration thereof tbe defendant bad agreed not to foreclose tbe deed of trust during tbe year 1933. It was alleged also that tbe defendant bad violated tbe agreement by advertising tbe property. There was allegation to tbe effect that certain credits bad not been allowed to tbe plaintiffs by tbe defendant upon said indebtedness.
This Court has held that it has tbe…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wentz v. Piedmont Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Leak v. . ArmfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lance v. CogdillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Huskins v. Yancey HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Whitford v. North Carolina Joint-Stock Land Bank of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Huskins v. Yancey Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Dennis v. RedmondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.