Legal Opinion

Hussein-Scott v. Scott

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2013No. 6768 S-14561PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

1. INTRODUCTION

Jerry Scott and Camilla Hussein-Scott dissolved their marriage and signed a marital settlement agreement requiring Jerry to pay alimony every month. On the line of the agreement reserved for the alimony termination date, Jerry wrote “12/2/2020,” which is the 18th birthday of their youngest daughter, Myriam. But on the next line, in a space left blank for “other specifics,” Jerry wrote, “To be paid until Yasmine Scott’s 18th birthday or until remarriage.” Yasmine is the couple’s middle daughter, and her 18th birthday is August 1, 2015. We are asked if…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Anthony v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. City of Homestead v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Cousineau v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mahan v. MahanAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Andrew B. v. Abbie B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Orville Wesley Jenkins Layton v. Mary Tabitha O'Dea, f/k/a Mary Tabitha O-Dea-LaytonAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Crowley Marine Services, Inc., Crowley Maritime Corporation, Northland Fuel, LLC, Yukon Fuel Company, Northland Vessel Leasing Company, LLC, and Yutana Barge Lines, LLC v. State of Alaska and Delta Western, LLC, Crowley Fuels LLC v. Delta Western LLC F/K/A Delta Western, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Derek James Saclamana v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API