Legal Opinion

Cherry Etc. v. Union Nat. Bk.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1925No. Appeal 142PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Defendant appeals from a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff in a suit in assumpsit brought against it by a trustee in bankruptcy to set aside a preference under the Bankrupt Act, ¡as amended in 1910, Section 60-B.

It was conceded at the trial that on April 29, 1924, Louis Mandel was insolvent and that on that day three of his notes, aggregating $6500, fell due at the Union National Bank, defendant; and that on April 30,1924, a petition in bankruptcy was filed against him. To prove the other facts necessary to make out its case plaintiff depended wholly upon the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Dunmore v. PaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Krewson v. SawyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Walkinshaw EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Schuette v. SwankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morningstar v. North East Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Hart, Schaffner & Marx v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Schwartz's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Hertzler v. NisslySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Sebastianelli v. Frank Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API