Cherry Etc. v. Union Nat. Bk.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gawthrop, J.,
Defendant appeals from a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff in a suit in assumpsit brought against it by a trustee in bankruptcy to set aside a preference under the Bankrupt Act, ¡as amended in 1910, Section 60-B.
It was conceded at the trial that on April 29, 1924, Louis Mandel was insolvent and that on that day three of his notes, aggregating $6500, fell due at the Union National Bank, defendant; and that on April 30,1924, a petition in bankruptcy was filed against him. To prove the other facts necessary to make out its case plaintiff depended wholly upon the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Dunmore v. PaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Krewson v. SawyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Walkinshaw EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Schuette v. SwankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Morningstar v. North East Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Hart, Schaffner & Marx v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Schwartz's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Hertzler v. NisslySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Sebastianelli v. Frank Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.