Legal Opinion

Plympton Cabinet Co. v. Rosenberg

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1929No. Appeals 195 and 196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

These two appeals are so related that they should be considered together and disposed of in one opinion. They are from orders refusing to open judgments entered by confession against the defendant by virtue of warrants of attorney contained in contracts of sale for two electric refrigerating cabinets bought by him from the legal plaintiff.

The first refrigerator cabinet, a fourteen foot case for use in defendant’s meat and grocery store, (Ap peal No. 196, April T., 1929) was sold on May 19, 1926, for $1,134, of which $174 was paid in cash and the balance $960 was to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beaty v. BordwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  2. Wolverine Glass Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Stroud's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  4. Hoffman v. WinstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Sheritt & Stoer Co. v. Roberts Engineering Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frigidinners, Inc. v. Branchtown Gun ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Holzapfel v. MahonySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Lytle v. WaltersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Sebastianelli v. Frank Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Plant Flour Mills Co. v. BaragSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API