Legal Opinion

United States v. Siamac Zakhor

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1995No. 94-50439PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:

I

In this appeal, we determine whether section 5E1.2(i) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines was validly promulgated under the version of the Sentencing Reform Act in effect at the time of Zakhor’s sentencing, and whether the section violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

Siamac Zakhor pleaded guilty to two counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3281, on April 5, 1994. On June 22, 1994, the district court sentenced Zakhor to three years’ probation and ordered him to pay more than $20,000 in fines and restitution. The fines…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Fine, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Rene SpiropoulosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Dale TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Jack R. Hawkins, Cynthia J. Hawkins, Husband & Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Robert F. HagmannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Paul A. Wright, on Behalf of All Similarly Situated Persons v. Chase RivelandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Hernandez GARCIA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Simon v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  4. United States v. Ruth Alston BreedingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API