Legal Opinion

Paul A. Wright, on Behalf of All Similarly Situated Persons v. Chase Riveland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 11, 2000No. 97-36074PublishedCited by 203 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSKOWITZ, District Judge:

This case involves a challenge to Washington statute RCW 72.09.480 (the “Statute”), which authorizes a deduction of 35% from all funds received by inmates from outside sources. Washington inmate, Paul Wright, on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated individuals (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Class”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of the Class’s Due Process and Excessive Fines claims against the Secretary of the Washington Department of Corrections (the “Department”). 2 The Class also appeals the district court’s grant of partial…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by203 opinions

  1. McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Danvers Motor Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Raymond P. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. United States v. Peter MacKbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API