Legal Opinion

United States v. Ruth Alston Breeding

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 26, 1997No. 95-6231PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUGGAN, District Judge.

Appellant Breeding pled guilty to making and using a materially false document before the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. A presentence investigation report (“PSI”) was prepared and both the United States and appellant filed objections. Nowhere in the body of the PSI was there a recommendation regarding the assessment of costs of imprisonment. However, attached to the PSI was a document entitled ‘Worksheet D” which stated that the cost of imprisonment was $1,734.00 monthly and the cost of supervised release was $180.90…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald J. BlandfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Quinn Hickey, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Rene SpiropoulosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. David W. LanierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Dale TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Henry A. BosticCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. Cardine v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Radford v. LovelaceKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  4. United States v. William SchockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Bryan Scott SchrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API