United States v. Ruth Alston Breeding
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUGGAN, District Judge.
Appellant Breeding pled guilty to making and using a materially false document before the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. A presentence investigation report (“PSI”) was prepared and both the United States and appellant filed objections. Nowhere in the body of the PSI was there a recommendation regarding the assessment of costs of imprisonment. However, attached to the PSI was a document entitled ‘Worksheet D” which stated that the cost of imprisonment was $1,734.00 monthly and the cost of supervised release was $180.90…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Donald J. BlandfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Quinn Hickey, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Rene SpiropoulosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. David W. LanierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Dale TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Henry A. BosticCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Cardine v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Radford v. LovelaceKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. William SchockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Bryan Scott SchrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.