Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Roper

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 11, 2012No. 05-09-01311-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice MOSELEY.

C.W. Roberts appeals the trial court’s summary judgment against him in this suit by Ronda K. Roper to recover on a promissory note. Roberts argues the trial court erred by rendering summary judgment for Roper, awarding attorney’s fees as stipulated in the note, and denying his motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We conclude Roper established she was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the promissory note and that Roberts failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact on any element of Roper’s claim or on all the elements of any of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Queen v. RBG USA Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Carssow-FranklinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. In re Carrsow-FranklinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. Felipe Lozano Manzo v. Lone Star National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015
  5. Jeramie Eitel, D/B/A Jeraco Investments and as Agent for Cliff's Star Construction, LLC Jenson Gainer And Otis Bakke v. John Horobec, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API