Legal Opinion

Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1997No. 95-0444PublishedCited by 1,190 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORNYN, Justice.

We withdraw our opinion of January 10, 1997, and substitute the following in its place. The parties’ motions for rehearing are overruled.

In this accounting malpractice ease, Perry Equipment Corporation (PECO) sued the accounting firm of Arthur Andersen for a faulty audit, which PECO relied on to purchase another company, Maloney Pipeline Systems. The audit favorably reported Ma-loney’s financial condition when, in fact, the company was suffering substantial losses. Fourteen months after the sale, Maloney filed for bankruptcy. PECO sued for violations of the Deceptive Trade…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Jefferson Associates, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ragsdale v. Progressive Voters LeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Brown v. American Transfer & Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Spencer v. Eagle Star Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,190 opinions

  1. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Usaa Texas Lloyds Company v. Gail MenchacaTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Holland v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Rohrmoos Venture, Eric Langford, Dan Basso, and Tobin Grove v. Utsw DVA Healthcare, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2019

1,185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API