Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Deschutes County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 29, 2010No. 2009061; 2009062; A145693PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

Petitioners seek review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision that affirmed Deschutes County’s interpretation of its own code provisions regarding mining near “dust-sensitive uses” and “noise-sensitive uses.” Those provisions, petitioners contend, protect petitioners’ entire parcel rather than simply a residence on their property. The county, however, interpreted the “dust-sensitive use” and “noise-sensitive use” provisions as applying only to the part of petitioners’ property that actually housed the dust-sensitive or noise-sensitive use — i.e., the dwelling. On review, petitioners…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Western Land & Cattle, Inc. v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Siporen v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wieck v. HostetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Deschutes County v. Pink Pit, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Hoffman v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API