Hoffman v. Deschutes County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.
Petitioners seek review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision that affirmed Deschutes County’s interpretation of its own code provisions regarding mining near “dust-sensitive uses” and “noise-sensitive uses.” Those provisions, petitioners contend, protect petitioners’ entire parcel rather than simply a residence on their property. The county, however, interpreted the “dust-sensitive use” and “noise-sensitive use” provisions as applying only to the part of petitioners’ property that actually housed the dust-sensitive or noise-sensitive use — i.e., the dwelling. On review, petitioners…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Western Land & Cattle, Inc. v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Siporen v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wieck v. HostetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Deschutes County v. Pink Pit, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Hoffman v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010