Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1918No. 8514PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from County Court, Woodward County; Clyde H. Wyand, Judge. Action by C. W. Harrison against C. L. Lambert. Judgment for plaintiff, motion for new trial overruled, and defendant brings •error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This is an action brought upon a promissory note, which said note is in the following words and figures:

“Chicago, Illinois, August 31, 1908.
“For'value received, the undersigned promises to pay at Chicago, Illinois, to the order of the Puritan Mfg. Co. five hundred dollars, as follows:
“$125 — 4 months after date.
“$125 — 8 months after date.
“$125 — 11 months after date.
“$125 — 14 months after date.
“A discount of 6 per cent, will be given if the full amount of this instrument is paid at maturity of first installment. Nonpayment of any installment for more than thirty days…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Porter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Bell v. Riggs Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Clevenger v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Puls v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Randolph v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Russell v. Lennox Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Laclede Oil & Gas Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Markle v. StekollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. B. H. Stief Jewelry Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API