Legal Opinion

B. H. Stief Jewelry Co. v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 30, 1952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickerson, J.

The original bill was filed by several jewelers of Nashville, Tennessee, to enjoin defendants from conducting an auction sale of jewelry.

While the principal suit was pending, complainants filed three separate petitions for contempt against various parties to the suit alleging that they had violated the injunctive process of the court. Upon these petitions, answers thereto, and proceedings had thereunder, the chancellor entered the following decrees:

“Decree of November 6, 1951,

M. B. 171 P 45

“B. H. Stief Jewelry Company et al. “v. No. 69327 P. H. Walker et al.,

In The Chancery Court, Part One,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vanvabry v. StatonTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Nashville Corp. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Graham v. WilliamsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Collier v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Weidner v. FriedmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ABC Liquidators, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. King v. LyonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Kalvin RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
  4. Huggins v. FollinTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State Ex Rel. King v. LyonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API