Legal Opinion

Bell v. Riggs Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 25, 1912No. 1704PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error from District Court, Kiowa County; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by Daniel A. Riggs and Jennie Riggs against the Winne Mortgage Company, M. Pauline Bell, and James B. Bell. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants, M. Pauline Bell and James B. Bell, bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

This is a suit by Daniel A. Riggs and Jennie Riggs against the Winne Mortgage Company, M. Pauline Bell, and James B. Bell, in which plaintiffs seek to cancel a mortgage for $1,560 on certain lands described in the petition. On the 3d day of January, 1905, the plaintiffs made application to the Winne Mortgage Company of Wichita, Kan., for a loan of $1,560 for ten years, at 10 per cent, interest, payable annually from the 1st day of March following, offering as security the land described in the petition. The application was made through the local agent of Winne & Winne at…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Union Central Life Ins. v. PollardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Jones v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Gans v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Merrill v. HurleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  5. McAllister v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1856

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Holmes v. HalstidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Finley v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Citizens' Savings Bank of Columbus v. LandisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Barnhart v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of TallmadgeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1919

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API